Background: As chronic wounds such as pressure injuries (PIs) are frequently colonized and can easily deteriorate into infection, it is important to reduce their bacterial load, for which antimicrobial dressings can be needed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a 3% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) foam dressing compared to that of a silver foam dressing.Methods: This prospective non-inferiority study was conducted between 2016 and 2019 at three sites in South Korea. A total of 80 PI subjects were randomized to be dressed with either PVP-I foam (experimental group) or silver foam (control group) for up to 8 weeks.Results: Based on the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool, 25.0% of the experimental groups and 17.5% of the control groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=0.743, P=0.389) healed by more than 70%. The degree of reduction in wound size was analyzed using Image J, and the experimental and control groups decreased by 41.6%±35.3% and 49.7%±38.2% (t=–0.986, P=0.327), respectively. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to confirm the time to heal showed that if more than 30% of the PUSH score was healed, the time to heal was 27.0±9.3 days and 18.0±2.8 days in the two groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=3.225, P=0.073), respectively. The healing rates at 50 days were 85.8%±8.9% and 93.9%±5.7% in the two groups (P=0.073), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in all results.Conclusion: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of the 3% PVP-I foam dressing compared to the silver foam dressing for PI treatment.