BACKGROUND: The depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is reportedly known tobe directly proportional to height and several height-based recommendations have beensuggested. This retrospective study was designed to find out the difference between calculated depths using height-based formulae and realistic depths in clinical practice of DLTplacement by analyzing pooled data from patients intubated with left-sided DLT. METHODS: The electronic medical records of adults, intubated with DLT from February 2018to December 2020, were reviewed. Data retrieved included age, sex, height, weight, andsize and depth of DLT. The finally documented DLT depth (depth final, DF) was comparedwith the calculated depths, and the relationship between height and DF was also evaluated.A questionnaire on endobronchial intubation method was sent to anesthesiologists. RESULTS: A total of 503 out of 575 electronic records of consecutive patients were analyzed.Although the relationship between height and DF was shown to have significant correlation(Spearman's rho = 0.63, P < 0.001), DF was shown to be significantly greater than calculated depths (P < 0.001). Despite 57.1% of anesthesiologists have knowledge of clinical recommendations to anticipate size and depth of DLT, no one routinely utilizes those recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists tend to place DLTs in a deeper position than expected whendepths are calculated using height-based recommendations. Although such discrepanciesmay not be clinically meaningful, efforts are needed to standardize the methods of endobronchial intubation to prevent potential complications associated with malposition.