<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Federated learning (FL) offers a way for healthcare institutions to collaboratively train machine learning models without sharing sensitive patient data. This systematic review aims to comprehensively synthesize the ethical dimensions of FL in healthcare, integrating privacy preservation, algorithmic fairness, governance, and equitable access into a unified analytical framework. The application of FL in healthcare between January 2020 and December 2024 is examined, with a focus on ethical issues such as algorithmic fairness, privacy preservation, governance, and equitable access. <b>Methods</b>: Following PRISMA guidelines, six databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and arXiv) were searched. The PROSPERO registration is CRD420251274110. Studies were selected if they described FL implementations in healthcare settings and explicitly discussed ethical considerations. Key data extracted included FL architectures, privacy-preserving mechanisms, such as differential privacy, secure multiparty computation, and encryption, as well as fairness metrics, governance models, and clinical application domains. <b>Results</b>: Out of 3047 records, 38 met the inclusion criteria. The most popular applications were found in medical imaging and electronic health records, especially in radiology and oncology. Through thematic analysis, four key ethical themes emerged: algorithmic fairness, which addresses differences between clients and attributes; privacy protection through formal guarantees and cryptographic techniques; governance models, which emphasize accountability, transparency, and stakeholder engagement; and equitable distribution of computing resources for institutions with limited resources. Considerable variation was observed in how fairness and privacy trade-offs were evaluated, and only a few studies reported real-world clinical deployment. <b>Conclusions</b>: FL has significant potential to promote ethical AI in healthcare, but advancement will require the development of common fairness standards, workable governance plans, and systems to guarantee fair benefit sharing. Future studies should develop standardized fairness metrics, implement multi-stakeholder governance frameworks, and prioritize real-world clinical validation beyond proof-of-concept implementations.

<b>Background</b>: Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI), integrating advanced AI algorithms with robotic platforms capable of sensing, planning, and acting, has emerged as a transformative approach in healthcare delivery. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on robotic perception, decision-making, and clinical impact of EAI systems in healthcare settings. <b>Methods</b>: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library for studies published between January 2020 and August 2025. Seventeen studies met eligibility criteria, spanning four domains: surgical assistance, rehabilitation, hospital logistics, and telepresence. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO under ID: CRD420261285936. <b>Results</b>: Perception architectures predominantly employed multimodal sensor fusion, combining vision with force/torque, depth, and physiological signals. Decision-making approaches included imitation learning, reinforcement learning, and hybrid symbolic-neural control. Key findings indicate that surgical robots demonstrated consistency advantages in specific experimental tasks, rehabilitation robotics produced statistically significant improvements (SMD = 0.29) across 396 randomized controlled trials, and both logistics and telepresence systems achieved very high operational success levels. Nonetheless, important barriers remain, including limited external validation, small sample sizes, and insufficient cost-effectiveness data. <b>Conclusions</b>: Future research should prioritize standardized benchmarks, prospective multicenter trials, and patient-centered outcome measures to facilitate clinical translation of EAI technologies.