RnDCircle Logo
이수현 연구실
서울대학교병원 이수현 교수
유방 영상의학
유방암 위험도 평가
유방 MRI
연구 영역
기본 정보
논문·특허
구성원

이수현 연구실

서울대학교병원 이수현 교수

이수현 연구실은 서울대학교병원 영상의학과의 임상 기반 연구실로서 유방 초음파, 유방촬영술, 유방 MRI를 이용한 유방암 진단과 위험도 평가를 수행합니다. 치밀 유방의 선조직 성분과 배경 실질 조영증강을 영상 바이오마커로 분석하여 암 발생 및 이차 암 위험을 평가하고, 확산강조 MRI와 동적 조영증강 MRI를 결합하여 관상피내암의 침윤암 병기 상승을 예측합니다. 또한 AI-CAD의 유방촬영술 정량 점수와 임상 증상, 생검, 병리 및 치료 정보를 통합하여 잠재 침윤암과 림프절 전이 위험을 분류합니다. 호르몬 수용체 저발현 유방암에서는 HER2 발현과 보조 내분비 치료에 따른 예후를 분석하여 환자별 치료 결정과 선별검사 전략을 지원하는 정밀의학 연구를 수행합니다.

유방 영상의학유방암 위험도 평가유방 MRIAI-CAD정밀의학
대표 연구 분야
연구 영역 전체보기
유방 영상 기반 암 위험도 평가 및 선별검사 thumbnail
유방 영상 기반 암 위험도 평가 및 선별검사
Breast Imaging-Based Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening
연구 분야 상세보기
연구 성과 추이
표시된 성과는 수집된 데이터 기준으로 산출되며, 일부 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
주요 논문
5
논문 전체보기
1
Conference abstract
|
·
인용수 0
·
2024
Abstract PO1-27-11: Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor Low-Positive Breast Cancer
Su Hyun Lee, Han Suk Ryu, Myoung‐jin Jang, Kyung-Hun Lee, Han‐Byoel Lee
IF 16.6 (2024)
Cancer Research
Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor (ER) low-positive (1–10%) breast cancer is a very rare subtype that accounts for only 2–5% of all breast cancer cases and was introduced as a new category in the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologist Guidelines. There are limited data on the overall benefit of endocrine therapy for patients with ER low-positive cancers. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with ER low-positive breast cancer and to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between patients who received and did not receive endocrine therapy. Methods: A retrospective search of the prospectively maintained database of our institution identified consecutive women with ER low-positive (1–10%) primary invasive breast cancer who underwent curative surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (Seoul, Korea) between January 2010 and April 2021. Standard immunohistochemical staining techniques were used to assess the level of ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, and semiquantitative scores (0–100%) were reported for ER and PR. DFS was defined as the time from surgery to the development of any recurrence and was compared between women who received and did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 721 women (median age, 51 years; range, 24–83 years) with ER low-positive cancer were included in the analysis. Overall, 28% (203/721) had AJCC stage I, 42% (304/721) had stage II, and 30% (214/721) had stage III. PR expression was negative (< 1%) in 79% (571/721), low-positive (1–10%) in 12% (90/721), and high-positive ( >10%) in 8% (60/721). HER2 expression was negative in 54% (390/721) and positive in 46% (331/721). Most women (88% [634/721]) received adjuvant endocrine therapy, including all women with PR expression >10%. Of the 661 women with PR expression ≤10%, 87 (13%) did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. HER2-targeted therapy was performed in 81% (268/331) of women with HER2-positive cancer. During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 98 (14%) had recurrence (25 locoregional/contralateral and 73 distant metastases). AJCC stage III (HR, 3.6; 95% CI: 2.4, 5.4; P < .001) and receiving total mastectomy (HR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.8; P = .004) were associated with worse DFS. Receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy was independently associated with better DFS in the entire cohort (HR, 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.76; P = .002) and in the HER2-negative subgroup (HR, 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.75; P = .004). In the HER2-positive subgroup, receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy was not significantly associated with better DFS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.32; P = .18). Conclusion: In this large cohort of women with ER low-positive breast cancers, adjuvant endocrine therapy was administered in the majority of cases, including those with PR >10% expression. Receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with better DFS, especially when HER2 expression was negative. Citation Format: Su Hyun Lee, Han Suk Ryu, Myoung-jin Jang, Kyung-Hun Lee, Han-Byoel Lee. Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor Low-Positive Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-27-11
Breast cancer
Medicine
Oncology
Internal medicine
Estrogen receptor
Endocrine system
Cancer
Adjuvant
Adjuvant therapy
Estrogen
2
Conference abstract
|
·
인용수 0
·
2024
Abstract PO2-28-07: Artificial Intelligence-based Computer-aided Diagnosis for Mammography: Predicting Occult Invasive Cancer in Women with Biopsy-proven Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Su Hyun Lee, Ha‐Jung Kim, Su Min Ha, Soo‐Yeon Kim, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon
IF 16.6 (2024)
Cancer Research
Abstract Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast cancer confined within the basement membrane. Due to the increase in breast cancer screening, DCIS is increasingly being diagnosed on biopsy. Active surveillance is a novel and evolving treatment strategy for DCIS to reduce overtreatment. Currently ongoing clinical trials of active surveillance include only mammographic findings in their eligibility criteria, however mammography has limited ability to detect occult invasive cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate whether an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) application for mammography can improve the prediction of occult invasive cancer in women with percutaneous needle biopsy-proven DCIS. Methods: A retrospective search of our database identified consecutive women with percutaneous needle biopsy-proven DCIS who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (Seoul, Korea) between June 2019 and May 2021. Two board-certified breast radiologists reviewed preoperative mammographic findings of the primary tumor in consensus according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Using a commercially available AI-CAD (Lunit INSIGHT for Mammography, Lunit Inc.), quantitative abnormality scores of 0 to 100% of the ipsilateral breast were obtained. Data were collected on age at diagnosis, symptoms, biopsy methods, DCIS grade on biopsy, and presence or absence of invasive cancer and axillary lymph node metastases on surgical pathology. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with prediction of occult invasive cancer. Results: Of 692 biopsy-proven DCIS in 692 women (mean age, 53 years ± 11 [standard deviation]), 298 (43%) presented as calcifications only, 160 (23%) as mass or asymmetry, and 111 (16%) as masses with calcifications. The other 123 (18%) cancers were not demonstrable on mammography. Surgical pathology revealed occult invasive cancer in 278 (40%) women and 18 (3%) had axillary metastasis. Women with occult invasive cancer showed higher abnormality scores on AI-CAD than women with pure DCIS (mean, 70% vs. 51%; P < .001), and women with axillary metastasis had higher abnormality scores on AI-CAD than women without axillary metastasis (mean, 88% vs. 58%; P = .002). High ( >75%) abnormality score on AI-CAD (Odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.6]; P < .001), age of 55 years or higher (OR, 1.6 [95% CI: 1.2, 2.3]; P =.005), present symptoms in the ipsilateral breast (OR, 2.7 [95% CI: 1.9, 4.0]; P < .001), biopsy performed with a 14-gauge automated gun (OR, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.7, 3.6]; P < .001), and high-grade DCIS at biopsy (OR, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.7, 3.5]; P < .001] were independent predictors of occult invasive cancer with a C-index of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.78). Conclusion: The quantitative score of preoperative mammography obtained from a commercially available AI-CAD was able to predict occult invasive cancer in an easy and simple manner. AI-CAD applications for preoperative mammography may be useful in predicting occult invasive cancer in women with biopsy-proven DCIS, especially in those without preoperative breast MRI. Citation Format: Su Hyun Lee, Hajung Kim, Su Min Ha, Soo-Yeon Kim, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon. Artificial Intelligence-based Computer-aided Diagnosis for Mammography: Predicting Occult Invasive Cancer in Women with Biopsy-proven Ductal Carcinoma in Situ [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-28-07.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-28-07
Medicine
Ductal carcinoma
Occult
Mammography
Breast cancer
Biopsy
Cancer
Pathology
Mammography screening
Oncology
3
Article
|
·
인용수 34
·
2022
Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Postoperative Surveillance Breast MRI: Association with Future Second Breast Cancer Risk
Su Hyun Lee, Myoung‐jin Jang, Heera Yoen, Youkyoung Lee, Yeon Soo Kim, Ah Reum Park, Su Min Ha, Soo‐Yeon Kim, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon
IF 19.7 (2022)
Radiology
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is a known risk factor for breast cancer. However, studies on the association between BPE and second breast cancer risk are still lacking. Purpose To investigate whether BPE at surveillance breast MRI is associated with subsequent second breast cancer risk in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Materials and Methods A retrospective search of the imaging database of an academic medical center identified consecutive surveillance breast MRI examinations performed between January 2008 and December 2017 in women who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer and had no prior diagnosis of second breast cancer. BPE at surveillance breast MRI was qualitatively assessed using a four-category classification of minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Future second breast cancer was defined as ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer diagnosed at least 1 year after each surveillance breast MRI examination. Factors associated with future second breast cancer risk were evaluated using the multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Results Among the 2668 women (mean age at baseline surveillance breast MRI, 49 years ± 8 [SD]), 109 developed a second breast cancer (49 ipsilateral, 58 contralateral, and two ipsilateral and contralateral) at a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Mild, moderate, or marked BPE at surveillance breast MRI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1 [95% CI: 1.4, 3.1]; P < .001), young age (<45 years) at initial breast cancer diagnosis (HR, 3.4 [95% CI: 1.7, 6.4]; P < .001), positive results from a BRCA1/2 genetic test (HR, 6.5 [95% CI: 3.5, 12.0]; P < .001), and negative hormone receptor expression in the initial breast cancer (HR, 1.6 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.6]; P = .02) were independently associated with an increased risk of future second breast cancer. Conclusion Background parenchymal enhancement at surveillance breast MRI was associated with future second breast cancer risk in women with a personal history of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Niell in this issue.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220440
Medicine
Breast cancer
Breast MRI
Hazard ratio
Breast imaging
Radiology
Retrospective cohort study
Cancer
Oncology
Internal medicine