Abstract 12393: Two-Year Clinical Outcome of Mid-Range Ejection Fraction at Admission in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ho Sung Jeon, Young In Kim, Junghee Lee, Dong‐Hyuk Cho, Young Jun Park, Jung‐Woo Son, Jun‐Won Lee, Young Jin Youn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Min‐Soo Ahn, Jang‐Young Kim, Byung‐Su Yoo, Seung‐Hwan Lee, Junghan Yoon, Dae Ryong Kang
Introduction: The American Heart Association and European Society of cardiology guidelines reclassified heart failure according to left ventricular ejection fraction, recognizing patients with mid-range EF (mrEF; 40% to 49%) as a distinct group. However, studies on the clinical characteristics of mid-range EF patients and the occurrence of cardiovascular events in acute MI patients are insufficient. Methods: We categorized 6,553 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from the Korea AMI-National Institutes of Health between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups (reduced EF ; LVEF < 40% at admission, mild-reduced EF ; LVEF 40 to 49%, preserved EF ;LVEF ≥50%). The primary endpoint was defined as any death at two-year. Secondary endpoints were defined as any myocardial infarction, any revascularization, patient-oriented composite outcome(POCE). Results: Compared to patients with other two groups, the reduced EF group had a highest overall mortality, POCE, and any MI (24.7% vs 8.3% vs 4.6%, p < 0.0001, 33.0% vs 15.6% vs 12.4%, p<0.0001, 3.9% vs 2.7% vs 2.6%, p<0.0046). When mid-range EF group was designated as a reference, in multivariate analysis including all variables, significant differences with HFrEF group was found. (Hazard ratio ). When compared with HFpEF, only Model 1 and Model 2 showed a significant statistical difference (Model 1 ; 0.65 (0.53-0.81), Model 2 ; 0.56 (0.56-0.86). Conclusions: Followed up for two years, significant differences in survival rates were observed between the mid-range EF, reduced EF, and preserved EF group. After adjusting for common prognostic factors affecting the overall mortality rate, the reduced EF group had a significantly higher mortality rate than mid-range EF group, but no significant difference was observed between the preserved EF and the mid-range EF group.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.12393
Medicine
Ejection fraction
Internal medicine
Myocardial infarction
Cardiology
Hazard ratio
Heart failure
Revascularization
Clinical endpoint
Proportional hazards model
상세 정보 바로가기