BACKGROUND: Previous randomized trials of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine on sepsis were limited by short-term vitamin C administration, heterogeneous populations, and the failure to evaluate each component's effect. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vitamin C alone for ≥ 5 days or in combination with corticosteroids and/or thiamine was associated with decreased mortality across the sepsis population and subpopulation. METHODS: Nationwide population-based study conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 384,282 adult patients with sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, while the key secondary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation] age was 69.0 [15.4] years; 57% were male; and 36,327 (9%) and 347,955 did and did not receive vitamin C, respectively. After propensity score matching, each group involved 36,327 patients. The hospital mortality was lower by - 0.9% in the treatment group (17.1% vs 18.0%; 95% confidence interval, - 1.3 to - 0.5%; p < 0.001), a significant but extremely small difference. However, mortality decreased greater in patients who received vitamin C for ≥ 5 days (vs 1-2 or 3-4 days) (15.8% vs 18.8% vs 18.3%; p < 0.001). Further, vitamin C was associated with a lower hospital mortality in patients with older age, multiple comorbidities, pneumonia, genitourinary infection, septic shock, and mechanical ventilation. Consistent findings were found for 90-day mortality. Moreover, vitamin C alone or in combination with thiamine was significantly associated with decreased hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous vitamin C of ≥ 5 days was significantly associated with decreased hospital and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients. Vitamin C combined with corticosteroids and/or thiamine in specific sepsis subgroups warrants further study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 470 million people and caused more than 6 million deaths worldwide. The high mortality mainly owes to the associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is characterised by the sudden onset of noncardiogenic pulmonary oedema and hypoxemia.1Matthay M.A. Zemans R.L. Zimmerman G.A. et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome.Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2019; 5: 18Crossref PubMed Scopus (361) Google Scholar Recent studies have revealed that COVID-19 ARDS is a dysregulated host response of inflammation, immunity, and interferon signalling.2Sarma A. Christenson S.A. Byrne A. et al.Tracheal aspirate RNA sequencing identifies distinct immunological features of COVID-19 ARDS.Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 5152Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Increasing evidence also suggests that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exerts detrimental effects on the capillary endothelium, possibly by altering the integrity of the endothelial barrier or promoting a pro-coagulant state and the resulted endothelial inflammation.3Teuwen L.A. Geldhof V. Pasut A. Carmeliet P. COVID-19: the vasculature unleashed.Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 20: 389-391Crossref PubMed Scopus (510) Google Scholar In addition to lung damage, sepsis and similar organ dysfunctions are also common, which further contribute to the high mortality of severe COVID-19.4Vincent J.L. Taccone F.S. Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19.Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8: 430-432Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar As severe COVID-19 shares common characteristics with ARDS or sepsis, the complex immune response cannot be easily distinguished from each other. In this issue of eBioMedicine, Gustafson and colleagues prospectively evaluated the prevalence of plasma inflammatory, cardiac, and endothelial cell biomarkers in 241 unvaccinated patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection and established a microRNA (miRNA) atlas.5Gustafson D. Ngai M. Wu R. et al.Cardiovascular signatures of COVID-19 predict mortality and identify barrier stabilizing therapies.eBioMedicine. 2022; 78Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Using COVID-19 severity and two symptom/severity-matched control groups,6National Institute of Health. COVID-19 treatment guidelines panel. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines. 2021. Available from: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed 24 March 2022.Google Scholar the authors first defined 5 patient groups: mild negative, mild COVID-19, moderate COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and severe negative. For risk assessment, a Random Forest model machine learning was performed utilizing clinical, protein marker, and miRNA data. Among protein biomarkers, Ang-2, ET-1, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, sE-selectin, sTREM-1, IL-6, IL-8, and MPO levels differed according to COVID-19 severity. However, there were no significant differences between the severe COVID-19 and severe negative groups. Among hospitalised patients, only Ang-2 was associated with mortality in univariate analysis. Moreover, only IL-6 and MPO remained significantly different between the severe COVID-19 and severe negative groups during the course of illness. These findings suggest that protein biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation may not be specific to COVID-19 status or mortality. Meanwhile, comparative analysis revealed 765 miRNAs that could be used for differentiation between the severe COVID-19 and severe negative groups; these included disease-relevant miRNA pathways for cardiomyocyte function and adherens junctions. In addition, there were 207 differentially expressed miRNAs between survivors and non-survivors in the severe COVID-19 group; these included miRNA pathways for platelet activation, extracellular matrix-receptor interactions, Ras, and ErbB2. Clinical data alone at the time of admission had low predictive capability for risk of hospital mortality (AUROC: 0·44). However, the addition of protein marker and miRNA data enhanced the model performance (AUROC: 0·82 and 0·76, respectively). Next, the authors performed ex vivo experiments to assess endothelial permeability in patient plasma. Interestingly, they found endothelial barrier disruption in response to plasma from moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, but not to plasma from severe negative patients. Administration of Q-peptide, synthetic Ang-1, or recombinant Slit2-N ameliorated the disruption of the endothelial barrier. However, administration of other agents (nangibotide and dexamethasone) had no such effect. Clinical trials have shown a significant survival benefit for dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 ARDS7Horby P. Lim W.S. Emberson J.R. Mafham M. et al.Recovery Collaborative GroupDexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 693-704Crossref PubMed Scopus (4412) Google Scholar while inconsistent results were reported for non-COVID-19 ARDS.1Matthay M.A. Zemans R.L. Zimmerman G.A. et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome.Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2019; 5: 18Crossref PubMed Scopus (361) Google Scholar The different results suggest distinct pathogenesis for COVID-19 ARDS. While endothelial cell biomarkers have shown utility in COVID-19 prognostication,8Kim W.Y. Kweon O.J. Cha M.J. Baek M.S. Choi S.H. Dexamethasone may improve severe COVID-19 via ameliorating endothelial injury and inflammation: a preliminary pilot study.PLoS One. 2021; 16e0254167Google Scholar it seems unlikely that a simple combination of biomarkers can characterise the pathophysiological alterations in COVID-19 patients or individualise management according to the immune phenotypes. The study by Gustafson and colleagues is important because the incorporation of clinical data with multi-omic approaches identified unique COVID-19 phenotypes and provided prognostic information and mechanistic evidence.9Vegter E.L. Schmitter D. Hagemeijer Y. et al.Use of biomarkers to establish potential role and function of circulating microRNAs in acute heart failure.Int J Cardiol. 2016; 224: 231-239Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar The authors should also be credited for demonstrating the failure of dexamethasone in stabilizing barrier function, which is consistent with preclinical studies that suggest glucocorticoids may impair endothelial function by decreasing vascular NO availability.10Ferrara F. Vitiello A. Efficacy of synthetic glucocorticoids in COVID-19 endothelites.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021; 394: 1003-1007Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar Further, glucocorticoids are only beneficial under inflammatory conditions, possibly due to decreased expression of IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, endothelin-1, and NF-kB.10Ferrara F. Vitiello A. Efficacy of synthetic glucocorticoids in COVID-19 endothelites.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021; 394: 1003-1007Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar The present study reinforces the notion that the timing and setting are important for therapeutic interventions. There are, however, important limitations. The associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes should be interpreted with caution due to the modest sample size, missing data, and inability to perform multivariable analysis. Moreover, although the severe negative group demonstrated symptoms consistent with a respiratory tract infection and were matched by illness severity, the group showed somewhat less severe (respiratory) symptom than that of the severe COVID-19 group. Further, compared with the severe negative group, the severe COVID-19 group had longer intensive care unit stays, and they were more likely to have ARDS and worse oxygenation. Indeed, the higher SOFA respiratory subscore in these patients might lead to biased results. For instance, the barrier disruption in response to severe COVID-19 patient plasma did not occur in plasma from severe negative patients. This may be due to the lower disease severity in the severe negative patients. It could be argued that any difference in the clinical trajectories between severe COVID-19 patients and severe negative patients is related to the biology of COVID-19. However, it is questionable that the study patients who presented with respiratory sepsis were clinically indistinguishable at the time of enrolment. Nevertheless, to our best knowledge, this is the first report to provide a comprehensive, multi-omics-based description of immune markers for risk stratification specific to COVID-19. The study offers novel insights with regard to the role of endothelium and endothelial barrier stabilizing treatments in COVID-19. Further studies with larger sample sizes and proper controls are needed to validate the results. WYK wrote the paper. The author declares no conflict of interest. Cardiovascular signatures of COVID-19 predict mortality and identify barrier stabilizing therapiesIntegration of multi-omics data identified microRNA and vascular biomarkers prognostic of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients and revealed that vascular stabilizing therapies should be explored as a treatment for endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19, and other severe diseases where endothelial dysfunction has a central role in pathogenesis. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Burnout among critical care physicians is an important issue that affects patient care and staff well-being. This study, conducted by the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine, aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among intensivists and critical care fellows in South Korea. From May to July 2019, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 51 hospitals and 79 intensive care units offering subspecialty training in critical care medicine. Invitations were sent by email and text, and responses were collected using NownSurvey and Google Forms. Of the 502 invited participants, 253 responded (response rate: 50.4%). Significant contributing factors of burnout included being in an intensivist position (assistant professor/fellow) (odds ratio [OR], 3.916; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.485-10.327; p = 0.006), working in a medical ICU (OR, 4.557; 95% CI, 1.745-11.900; p = 0.002), the number of stay-home night calls per month (OR, 1.070; 95% CI, 1.005-1.139; p = 0.034), and recent conflicts with colleagues (OR, 5.344; 95% CI, 1.140-25.051; p = 0.033). Similar factors were found to influence severe levels of burnout. This nationwide study indicates that a significant proportion of critical care physicians in South Korea experience burnout. Strategies to reduce overtime and workplace conflict are imperative to reduce burnout among these physicians and protect their mental health. Future research should explore targeted interventions for these specific factors.

This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the optimal timing, dosing, and duration of vitamin C administration to increase survival and attenuate organ injuries in murine sepsis. Mice were randomized to receive ascorbic acid (AscA) at 1 or 6 h after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). At each time point, mice randomly received AscA for 4 or 8 d. Mice were assigned to sham and CLP groups, as well as CLP + AscA groups that were treated with AscA at doses of 90, 180, or 360 mg/kg/d. The survival curves diverged significantly when AscA was injected at doses of 180 or 360 mg/kg/d for 8 d, although this was not observed when the treatment was limited to 4 d. AscA at doses of 180 or 360 mg/kg/d for 8 d preserved lung architecture while attenuating the abnormal expression of tight junction proteins. Kidney and liver injuries were evident in CLP mice, with elevated expression of biomarkers and inflammatory mediators; however, exposure to AscA at doses of 180 or 360 mg/kg/d for 8 d improved the histological changes and decreased biomarker expression levels. Very high-dose and prolonged vitamin C administration may potentially play a role in the management of sepsis-associated organ injuries.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary fibrosis can persist long after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, thereby reducing quality of life and lung function. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors for pulmonary fibrosis in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), a high-risk group for developing pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: Clinical data and chest computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring MV were retrospectively collected from nine hospitals in South Korea. Fibrotic-like changes on chest CT were visually assessed. RESULTS: = 0.018) was associated with a reduced risk of pulmonary fibrosis, along with a higher heart rate on intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring MV, chest CT revealed fibrotic-like changes in approximately three-quarters of patients. In addition, our results suggest that higher daily doses of steroids may be associated with a reduced risk of pulmonary fibrosis. Further research is needed to determine the appropriate steroid dose that may reduce the progression of pulmonary fibrosis and improve clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006312.

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized trials of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine on sepsis were limited by short-term vitamin C administration, heterogeneous populations, and the failure to evaluate each component's effect. The purpose of this study was to determine whether vitamin C alone for ≥ 5 days or in combination with corticosteroids and/or thiamine was associated with decreased mortality across the sepsis population and subpopulation. METHODS: Nationwide population-based study conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 384,282 adult patients with sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, while the key secondary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation] age was 69.0 [15.4] years; 57% were male; and 36,327 (9%) and 347,955 did and did not receive vitamin C, respectively. After propensity score matching, each group involved 36,327 patients. The hospital mortality was lower by - 0.9% in the treatment group (17.1% vs 18.0%; 95% confidence interval, - 1.3 to - 0.5%; p < 0.001), a significant but extremely small difference. However, mortality decreased greater in patients who received vitamin C for ≥ 5 days (vs 1-2 or 3-4 days) (15.8% vs 18.8% vs 18.3%; p < 0.001). Further, vitamin C was associated with a lower hospital mortality in patients with older age, multiple comorbidities, pneumonia, genitourinary infection, septic shock, and mechanical ventilation. Consistent findings were found for 90-day mortality. Moreover, vitamin C alone or in combination with thiamine was significantly associated with decreased hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous vitamin C of ≥ 5 days was significantly associated with decreased hospital and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients. Vitamin C combined with corticosteroids and/or thiamine in specific sepsis subgroups warrants further study.