RnDCircle Logo
김형진 연구실
가톨릭대학교 의학과
김형진 교수
기본 정보
연구 분야
프로젝트
발행물
구성원

김형진 연구실

가톨릭대학교 의학과 김형진 교수

본 연구실은 대장암·직장암을 중심으로 한 소화기외과 및 대장항문외과 분야에서 수술 종양학, 림프절 전이와 재발 예측, 보조항암치료 전략, 최소침습 복강경·단일공 수술, 항문 보존 수술, 복벽 결손 및 탈장 재건까지 폭넓은 임상연구를 수행하며, 환자 맞춤형 치료와 수술 성적 및 삶의 질 향상을 목표로 한다.

대표 연구 분야
연구 영역 전체보기
대장암·직장암의 수술 종양학과 예후 예측 thumbnail
대장암·직장암의 수술 종양학과 예후 예측
주요 논문
5
논문 전체보기
1
article
|
인용수 0
·
2022
12-month secondary outcomes of a prostate cancer survivor symptom self-management intervention.
Sarah T. Hawley, Tabitha Metreger, Hyung Jin Kim, Ted A. Skolarus
IF 41.9
Journal of Clinical Oncology
373 Background: Long term adverse symptoms following treatment for prostate cancer are prevalent and can negatively impact quality of life and increase healthcare seeking, even though many symptoms can be effectively self-managed. There remains a need for tools to support long term survivors to feel confident in their ability to self-manage their symptoms, potentially translating to more efficient health care utilization. Methods: We conducted a RCT of an automated tailored self-management support intervention (vs. newsletter) for long term (> 1 year) Veteran survivors of prostate cancer recruited from 4/2015-2/2017 across four VA sites. Participants were randomized (278 per arm) and assessed via survey at 5 months and 12 months post enrollment. The intervention delivered tailored information regarding symptoms for urinary, sexual, bowel and general health over 3 months, allowing participants to choose focus areas. At 12 months, we assessed secondary trial outcomes; participants’ reports of use of services relative to their symptoms (urinary, bowel, sexual, general health) and their confidence in symptom self-management (scale from 5-15). We also assessed use of procedures and medications related to each symptom area via medical charts. We tested differences in reported and documented service use between arms using T-tests and Chi-square tests. We further assessed participants engagement in components of the intervention. Results: Of those randomized, 81.7% completed the 12-month survey assessment (N = 226 Intervention and N = 228 Control). The average age was 66.7, 28% were Black, and 49% were high school graduates or less. Participants in the intervention arm reported greater confidence in symptom self-management than controls (Mean: 13.5 vs. 12.9; P = 0.01). Intervention participants reported less often using services related to urinary (43.9% vs. 56.0%, P = 0.03) and sexual (42.3% vs. 57.6%, P = 0.04) health over the prior 7 months. Review of intervention paradata found that urinary and sexual health were the topics most frequently engaged with among intervention subjects. No significant differences in medical chart documented procedures related to symptom areas were found. Conclusions: This secondary trial analysis found that 12 months post enrollment, Veterans who engaged with a tailored self-management intervention were more confident in their ability to self-manage their symptoms. The associated finding of fewer visits for the most commonly chosen areas for symptom self-management suggests that such an intervention may hold promise for helping long term survivors to effectively self-manage adverse symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT01900561.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.373
Medicine
Quality of life (healthcare)
Randomized controlled trial
Intervention (counseling)
Prostate cancer
Physical therapy
Family medicine
Cancer
Internal medicine
Nursing
2
article
|
인용수 0
·
2018
Self-management in prostate cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
Ted A. Skolarus, Tabitha Metreger, Hyung Jin Kim, Robert L. Grubb, Jeffrey R. Gingrich, Hui Zhu, Soohyun Hwang, John D. Piette, Sarah T. Hawley
IF 41.9
Journal of Clinical Oncology
5011 Background: The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare a personally-tailored symptom management intervention consisting of 4 automated telephone assessments and tailored education for improving symptom self-management among prostate cancer survivors to usual care (1 non-tailored newsletter about symptom management). We hypothesized improved symptom self-management and prostate cancer quality of life following the intervention. Methods: A total of 556 prostate cancer survivors experiencing symptom burden were recruited from April 2015 to February 2017 across 4 sites. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 278) and usual care (n = 278) groups as reported in our protocol. Our primary outcome was symptom burden assessed via patient report 5 months after enrollment using the EPIC-26 instrument. Secondary outcomes included psychosocial outcomes and domain-specific changes according to intervention participants’ primary symptom area (urinary, bowel, sexual, general). We used multivariable regression analysis to evaluate intervention impact on outcomes. Results: The mean age of prostate cancer survivors was 66.7 years and the majority was treated with radiation therapy (56.7% vs. 46.2% surgery). The 5 month primary outcome assessment was completed by 89% of participants. There were no baseline differences across groups. At 5 months, we observed differences between groups in urinary domains (irritative - 61.8 control vs. 63.4 intervention, adjusted mean difference (aMD) 2.6, p = 0.07; obstructive - 74.5 control vs. 77.4 intervention, aMD 2.6, p = 0.07) with no significant differences in other outcomes. Intervention participants choosing urinary (crude mean difference (cMD) irritative 3.0; p = 0.09, obstructive 6.1; p < 0.01), bowel (cMD 9.1; p = 0.08), and sexual (cMD 5.6; p < 0.01) domains as their primary focus area reported improvements at 5 months. Participants reported high satisfaction with the intervention. Conclusions: A personally-tailored, automated telephone symptom management intervention for prostate cancer survivors was feasible and led to differences in urinary and sexual health symptoms in this randomized trial. Self-management of treatment-related side effects appears warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01900561.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.5011
Medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Psychosocial
Prostate cancer
Quality of life (healthcare)
Physical therapy
Intervention (counseling)
Cancer
Urinary system
Internal medicine
3
article
|
인용수 3
·
2016
Oncologic outcome of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Hyung Jin Kim, Gun Kim, Ri Na Yoo, Bong‐Hyeon Kye, Hyeon‐Min Cho
IF 41.9
Journal of Clinical Oncology
661 Background: Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is a major cause of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer. This study investigates the oncologic outcome based on LPLN status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Methods: Between January 2009 and February 2013, 141 patients with rectal cancer received nCRT followed by curative radical surgery in our hospital. 16 patients were identified with LPLN before nCRT. These patients were categorized to two groups according to nCRT response evidenced by post-nCRT imaging studies with 5mm criteria. Group 1 included 7 patients who showed disappearance of LPLN after nCRT. Group 2 consisted of the patients identified with LPLN after nCRT. Results: The mean follow-up period was 35.6 ± 12.8 months. The mean overall survival (OS) period and 3-year OS rate for the patient with LPLN before nCRT was 56.0 ± 2.6 months and 93.3%, respectively. The mean relapse free survival period and 3-year RFS rate for the patient with LPLN before nCRT was 32.6 ± 5.7 months and 47.1%, respectively. The risk factors associated with RFS were ypN stage (P = 0.031), tumor location (P = 0.002), and postoperative CEA level (P = 0.022). Comparing RFS between Group 1 and 2, Group 1 tended to demonstrate longer RFS (P = 0.058). Analyzing oncologic outcome of two groups compared to the cohort population, group 1 showed similar oncologic outcome with ypTNM stage II. Group 2 demonstrated a tendency of worse oncologic outcome than ypTNM stage III (Group 1 vs. ypII P = 0.761 and Group 2 vs. ypIII P = 0.135). Conclusions: Preoperative LPLN status after nCRT seems to influence oncologic outcome in rectal cancer patient. If patients with LPLN metastasis before nCRT exhibit persistent LPLN metastasis after nCRT, they may require additional treatment.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.661
Medicine
Colorectal cancer
Stage (stratigraphy)
Lymph node
Lymph node metastasis
Distant metastasis
Internal medicine
Cohort
Overall survival
Metastasis
정부 과제
2
과제 전체보기
1
주관|
2022년 8월-2023년 8월
|8,000,000
복벽 수복, 재건, 재생을 위한 한중 공동 세미나
한중 공동 세미나의 주요 주제는 진행 중인 연구 및 임상 연구와 밀접하게 관련되어 있으며 양국 참가자의 큰 관심을 끄는 몇 가지 중요한 기초 연구 및 임상 문제에 초점을 맞출 것입니다. 기초 연구 측면에서 세미나는 "복벽 복구, 재건 및 재생 뒤에 숨겨진 과학"에 중점을 두며 다음 세 섹션으로 구성된다 섹션 1: 복벽 복구, 재건 및 재생을 위한 조직 공학 및 나노 기술의 연구 발전. 섹션 2: 복벽 수리, 재건 및 재생을 위한 적층 제조 기술의 적용. 섹션 3: 복벽 복구, 재건 및 재생을 위해 개발 중인 고급 생체 재료. 임상 문제에서 세미나는 "복벽 복구, 재건 및 재생의 임상 성과 및 미래 발전"에 초점을 맞출 것이며 다음 5개 섹션으로 구성된다 섹션 1: 복벽 수리, 재건 및 재생의 새로운 증거 및 혁신. 섹션 2: 임상 복벽 복구 및 재건에 대한 증거 및 논쟁. 섹션 3: 임상 복벽 복구 및 재건에 적용되는 새로운 기술. 섹션 4: 복잡한 임상 복벽 복구 및 재건. 섹션 5: 복벽 수리, 재건 및 재생의 미래.
탈장
복벽 결손
재건
재생
2
주관|
2018년 5월-2021년 5월
|12,500,000
대장암에서 항암제 내성 유전자를 표적하는 siRNA를 전달하는 항종양 전달 시스템 구축
본 과제는 대장암에서 항암제 내성을 만드는 유전자의 기능을 siRNA 혹은 miRNA로 저하시켜 치료효과를 높이고자 하며, 대장암세포를 표적하는 공학적 외소포체로 “생체적합성”과 “항종양효율성”을 동시에 향상시키는 연구임. 연구 목표는 MRP1-9, Pin1, TRPC6 등 항암제 내성 관련 유전자 기능 억제 후 항종양효과를 검증하는 것임. 연구 내용은 (1) 내성 인자 발굴·효과분석 및 대장암 특이적 수용체-결합 peptide를 pDisplay™ Vector로 발현한 외소포체 제작, (2) mi/siRNA loading 및 HA/myc로 외소포체 확인, (3) 대장암 xenograft 마우스모델에서 꼬리정맥 주입 후 종양 크기·무게와 RT-PCR/Western blotting/면역염색, FAS promoter assay, Ion transport assay, 칼슘/STAT3 활성화 확인임. 기대효과는 항암제 다제 내성(MDR) 극복과 mi/siRNA 기반 biologic therapy로 부작용 저감 및 표적기술 기반 높은 효율 제시 가능함.
대장암
항암제 내성 유전자
외소포체
표적치료
공학적 엑소좀
최신 특허
특허 전체보기
상태출원연도과제명출원번호상세정보
거절2021대장암 특이적 표적 엑소좀 조성물 및 이의 용도1020210157985
전체 특허

대장암 특이적 표적 엑소좀 조성물 및 이의 용도

상태
거절
출원연도
2021
출원번호
1020210157985